
Nowadays all the world talk about the human rights but...these corrects are right? Often I think in this question. The human rights of the today had been elaborated for the society American, European and Japanese, and this human rights are elaborated with rests of the culture of this regions. But the rest of regions of the world? The human rights have considerated the culture of this regions?
Well I think that the human rights are arbitraries and are different according to the region. For example, I can think that the abolition of the clitoris in some cultures is cruel and inhuman but my reaction is normal because in my culture, in my society, this ritual isn’t practise, but for the society that practises this ritual is normal and the big number of girls of this societies see normal this ritual.
In conclusion I think that the now human rights are incorrects because this rights aren’t neutrals and I think that the human rights only would have to be executed in the moment in which any action on a person was carried out without permission of this person.
Well I think that the human rights are arbitraries and are different according to the region. For example, I can think that the abolition of the clitoris in some cultures is cruel and inhuman but my reaction is normal because in my culture, in my society, this ritual isn’t practise, but for the society that practises this ritual is normal and the big number of girls of this societies see normal this ritual.
In conclusion I think that the now human rights are incorrects because this rights aren’t neutrals and I think that the human rights only would have to be executed in the moment in which any action on a person was carried out without permission of this person.